Skip to main content

Presentation Package

At the end of the CACoM course, each team presents and submits a complete package summarizing their project results. Your Presentation Package consists of four elements:

  1. 🎬 One-minute video – your concise highlight pitch
  2. πŸ–ΌοΈ Poster – the visual summary of your work
  3. πŸ—£οΈ Oral presentation – a brief in-person walkthrough of your poster, followed by discussion and defence of your project during the poster session
  4. πŸ“¦ Reproducibility package – all materials required to verify or reproduce your work (e.g., report, code, diagrams, raw data, data summaries)

These four components together demonstrate what you did, what you found, how you did it, and why it matters.


🎬 One-Minute Video​

Purpose​

The short video serves as your project teaser β€” a dynamic summary that communicates your idea and results to a broad audience.

Requirements​

AspectSpecification
Length≀ 1 minute
FormatMP4, 1080p preferred
Content(suggestion: ) Problem statement β†’ approach β†’ key insight/result β†’ impact
ToneProfessional but creative; voiceover or captions encouraged
DeadlineSame as poster submission
note

You may use slides, screencasts, or short footage β€” whichever best communicates your story.
Keep it concise and focused: if you can explain it in 40 seconds, without it feeling rushed or incomplete, even better.

Common Pitfall

Avoid β€œpromotional-style” videos with no scientific substance.
This is not a startup pitch, music video, or cinematic trailer β€” it's a compact scientific communication.
Every second of your video should serve a purpose: to clarify the question, method, or finding.
If a clip doesn't contribute to understanding your project, cut it out.

That said, if you enjoy being creative β€” go for it! Having fun while making your video can be valuable in its own right. Just remember: creativity is welcome, but it's not what's graded β€” clarity and scientific focus are.


πŸ–ΌοΈ Poster​

Purpose​

The poster communicates your project's motivation, methods, results, and conclusions in a clear and visually engaging way. It should be understandable to an interdisciplinary audience of data scientists, clinicians, and engineers.

Requirements​

AspectSpecification
FormatA1 (portrait or landscape) – PDF for submission
ContentTitle, author names, affiliations, abstract, motivation, data/methods, results, discussion, key references
StyleClear visual hierarchy; avoid dense text; highlight key findings and visuals
FiguresHigh-resolution, properly labeled, with readable axes and units
AcknowledgmentsInclude collaborators, data sources, and supervision info
tip

Think of your poster as an extended abstract β€” a self-contained overview that someone can understand in 2–3 minutes without you explaining it.


πŸ—£οΈ Oral Presentation (Poster Session)​

Structure​

During the final session, each team will:

  • Present their poster and video highlight.
  • Answer questions from peers, instructors, and invited guests.
  • Demonstrate any relevant code, app, or prototype (if applicable).

Timing​

  • 2 minutes presentation + 3 minutes Q&A (TBD – might be adjusted based on the number of teams, closer to the date of the symposium).

Evaluation​

The session contributes to your Grading under the Presentation & Communication criterion. You will be assessed on clarity, visual quality, timing, and ability to answer questions.

Poster session​

Additionally, you will be asked to participate in the poster session, which provides an opportunity for informal discussions with attendees of the symposium. Keep in mind that course evaluators may also attend and use these interactions as part of their broader assessment of your understanding and communication skills.


πŸ“¦ Reproducibility Package​

Purpose​

The reproducibility package documents how you achieved your results and enables others to repeat or extend your work. It ensures transparency and scientific credibility.

Contents​

Your package may include:

  • Report β€” short technical summary or extended poster write-up
  • Code β€” scripts or notebooks used for analysis (with instructions)
  • Data description β€” what data were used, how they were obtained, and any preprocessing steps
  • Figures / diagrams β€” plots, architectures, or flowcharts explaining the workflow
  • README file β€” instructions for reproducing key results
  • and other relevant materials
tip

Your reproducibility materials should make it possible for someone familiar with the field to rerun your analysis or replicate your figures without having to contact you.

Format​

A compressed folder (.zip or .tar.gz) or Git repository link, organized with clear subfolders (e.g., /code, /data, /report).

Evaluation​

This component is graded under Results, Analysis & Reflection and Reproducibility criteria.
Incomplete or disorganized submissions will reduce your score even if the project itself is excellent.

tip

See Reproducibility Package for detailed guidelines on structure, documentation, and best practices.


Submission Package Overview​

When submitting, send smaller materials by email to Prof. Martin Daumer (CC Pooja N. Annaiah) and upload larger files (poster, video, reproducibility package) to the official Google Drive folder, which will be shared with all teams in due course.

ComponentFormatDestination / Method
PosterPDF (A1 format)Google Drive folder
One-minute videoMP4Google Drive folder
Oral presentationIn-personDuring the poster session
Reproducibility packageFolder or Git linkGoogle Drive folder or Git repository link
Short communications / questionsText / PDFEmail to Prof. Martin Daumer (CC Pooja N. Annaiah)
note

Once projects are approved and group numbers are assigned, always include your group number in the email subject line when submitting or corresponding. The link to the shared Google Drive folder will be provided after project approval, closer to the submission deadline. Do not upload sensitive or proprietary data to public repositories.

Common Pitfalls
  • Overloading posters with text or raw code outputs
  • Submitting videos longer than 1 minute
  • Missing acknowledgments or dataset descriptions
  • Disorganized reproducibility folders
  • Submitting only code without documentation or report
  • Forgetting that presentation quality and reproducibility both impact your grade

Quick Checklist​

Before the submission deadline, make sure the following are complete:

  • Poster (A1, PDF) finalized, clear, and scientifically accurate
  • One-minute highlight video completed and polished
  • Oral presentation rehearsed and timed (3 + 2 minutes)
  • Ready to walk through and defend every aspect of your poster during the session
  • Reproducibility package complete, documented, and uploaded
  • All materials submitted to the shared Google Drive folder and confirmed by email to Prof. Martin Daumer (CC Pooja N. Annaiah) before the deadline