Project checklists
Use these lists to check your progress and coordinate your team; you don't submit them. Grading explains how we assess your work.
Topic refinement
The Refinement guide shows how to sharpen your question, and the Proposal guide explains how approval works.
- Picked a listed project from Topics & projects or prepared a custom topic
- Defined a specific, testable research question
- Identified your data sources and checked that you can access or collect the data
- Clarified inputs, outputs and evaluation criteria
- Explained why the question matters clinically, physiologically or scientifically
- Outlined a feasible method (computational, analytical, experimental or survey) and a fallback plan
- Gave at least one mini-pitch in class before sending the proposal, and used the feedback (custom topics only)
- Named a group lead
- Wrote the proposal (at most two pages) with the template
- Sent the proposal to support@cacom.dev by the topic approval deadline on the Schedule
- Received topic approval
Project execution
- Roles and responsibilities assigned within the team
- Team communication channels agreed (for example email, Slack or shared documents)
- At least one member at every class, with a short update and a question for us (see class participation)
- A ticket sent beforehand whenever nobody from your group can make a class
- support@cacom.dev in CC on every email with collaborators, including the first one
- Regular check-ins held and progress written down
- Methods piloted early on a small subset of the data
- Evaluation metrics defined and validated
- Feasibility risks reviewed and fallback options ready
- Draft results reviewed within the team at least a week before the poster and video deadline
Collaboration conduct
Details are in the collaboration policy.
- For an established CACoM collaborator, Prof. Daumer made the introduction (ask via support@cacom.dev or in class)
- Collaborator introduced to the whole team
- Communication polite, timely and traceable (email preferred)
- Meetings confirmed and followed by a short written summary
- Feedback acknowledged and acted on
- Confidential and proprietary information handled responsibly, and limits on collaborator-owned materials respected
- Problems or delays reported to support@cacom.dev right away
Academic integrity and AI tools
See the AI tools and plagiarism and citation policies.
- The reasoning and writing are your own; AI only assisted
- You can explain and defend every result, figure and sentence
- All external sources (papers, datasets, code) cited, and no reference is fabricated or unverifiable
- Meaningful AI help briefly acknowledged in the report or README
- Plagiarism check done before each submission
Presentation package
Requirements and the symposium format are on the Presentation package page.
- Poster visually clear, self-contained and scientifically accurate
- Figures and references labeled and consistent with your results
- All collaborators and contributors acknowledged
- Video is an MP4 in 1080p with sound, at most one minute long
- Video makes sense without an introduction and has no promotional filler
- Partner consent and confidentiality checked before the poster and video deadline (posters and videos are public at the symposium)
- Poster printed in A1 (you get the printing cost refunded)
- Poster walkthrough rehearsed, and you can explain and defend every element on the poster
- Break rotation agreed, so at least one of you stays at the poster during every break
- Whole team can attend the poster session
Reproducibility package
The Reproducibility page lists what the package needs, and Data privacy covers where data may go.
- Code organized, commented and runnable from a clean start
- README explains exactly how to reproduce your results
- Dependencies and environments listed (
requirements.txt,environment.ymlor similar) - Data sources documented, and each data file labeled as synthetic, anonymized or pseudonymized
- Real or partner-provided data stored only in the CACoM Google Drive and never uploaded publicly
- Proprietary or restricted parts clearly marked and described
- Every core figure and result can be regenerated from your scripts
- A team member unfamiliar with the code reproduced the results by following the README
Final submission
Both deadlines are on the Schedule.
Before the poster and video deadline
- Whole team has approved the final poster and video
- File names descriptive and consistent (not
final_v3_last.pdf) - Poster (A1 PDF) and video uploaded to your group's Google Drive folder
- Uploaded files open correctly
- Ticket sent to support@cacom.dev with your group number in the subject (see the subject format)
Before the reproducibility deadline
- Whole team has approved the final package
- Reproducibility package (
.zipor.tar.gz) uploaded to your group's Google Drive folder, and it opens correctly - GitHub repository link shared with us, if you use one
- Ticket sent to support@cacom.dev, again with your group number in the subject